M-Audio M-Track Solo vs Behringer UM2: Comparison And Review!

M-Audio M-Track Solo vs Behringer UM2

The M-Audio M-Track Solo audio interface could be the best low-cost choice. We’d even go so far as to say that there’s nothing more delicious under $50 right now. Everything it does is well worth the money, and we recommend acquiring one even if it isn’t your preferred interface. Consider why we find it so enjoyable. Whereas when we talk about Behringer um2, due to its black metal body with a few silver accents, Behringer’s U-Phoria UM2 is quite impressive than m-audio m- track and many other audio interfaces in the market. These hues and styles are becoming increasingly popular in the world of audio interfaces.

When you look closely, you’ll notice that the audio interface features plastic components rather than metal ones, making it lighter than its competitors. It’s worth noting that, despite the plastic components in Behringer um2, the frame is sturdy and well-constructed.

The M-Track Solo is a 22-track audio interface designed for beginning musicians and mobile musicians. Despite being an entry-level interface, it retains the preamp found on more expensive M-Crystal Audio products.

M-Audio M-Track Solo vs Behringer UM2: Comparison Chart

Computer ConnectivityUSB 2.0USB 2.0
Analog Inputs48Khz 2-Channel1 x XLR-1/4″ combo (mic/line), 1 x 1/4″ (Hi-Z)
Analog Outputs1xdual Rca Stereo1 x Dual RCA Stereo
Power SupplyUSB/Direct switchUSB bus-powered
Phantom PowerYESYES

M-Audio M-Track Solo vs Behringer UM2: Detailed Analysis

Build Quality

The M-Track Solo is in terms of build quality is supreme. However, this is in comparison to other interfaces in the same price range as Behringer um-2.

Talking about Behringer um 2, the outside plastic in Behringer um 2 is of the highest grade and provides a strong sense of permanency. It is not recommended that you set any other heavy devices on top of the UM2 when transporting it in a backpack to avoid unintentional damage.

Plastic is also used for the unit’s switches and controls. There is an appearance of looseness at first, but they all perform quite well in the studio, especially in a home studio.

MUST-READ| JBL Partybox 310 Vs Boombox 2: Which One is Better?

Functions and Controls

M-Audio M-Track Solo

In Behringer UM2, there are two inputs. The interface supports both XLR and 14 cable connections. If you utilize a 14-pin cable for the second input, you must use an XLR cable for the first input.

Whereas talking about m-audio m-track, an XLR/TRS combo input on the front panel accepts either a microphone or a line-level feed. A TRS input next to the combo input allows you to choose between line and instrument level operation. The XLR/TRS input supports 48 V phantom power via a front-panel switch.


There is a 6.3 mm headphone output with direct monitoring that can be switched on and off. All of the inputs and outputs are controlled by the top panel.

Although the headphone and main outputs share a volume knob, each channel has its own gain control and LED clipping indicator.

In Behringer um 2 the two LED indications on the audio interface are situated close to the inputs. A first indicator must be provided on the screen to inform the user whether or not the interface is picking up the signal. If you are hearing too much noise, a second light will illuminate.

The back panel in m-audio m-track solo is kept as simple as possible. It has two unbalanced RCA monitor outputs as well as a USB port.

The M-Track Duo comes with two XLR/TRS combination inputs, balanced TRS monitor outputs, and independent volume controls for monitors and headphones. Aside from that, each of these interfaces adheres to the same criteria. While Behringer um-2 audio interface also provides +48V Phantom Power. ” To activate the Phantom Power, press the on/off switch on the back of the interface. Condenser microphones benefit immensely from this feature since it provides the extra boost they require to function properly.

MUST-READ| Ultimate Ears Wonderboom 2 Vs Megaboom 3 Comparison!

Audio Quality

Behringer UM2

The M-Track Solo, according to M-Audio, has 24-bit digital to analog conversion. Despite the fact that the PCM2900 chip in the M-Track Solo only has a 16-bit converter, 24-bit performance is not attainable. We cannot confirm that this is accurate for all units, however, M-Audio is likely to have changed certain internal components to meet the specifications they specify.

The Behringer UM2 employs Behringer’s Xenyx preamp. Because of the preamp’s exceptional sound quality, which is incredibly clear and crisp, all gain settings may be easily managed.

It should be noted at this point that if you try to push the UM2 too hard and make it too loud, the audio interface gets fairly noisy. It is as simple as paying attention to the levels and keeping them under control to avoid this.

By carefully regulating the volume and making small adjustments to the audio interface and the DAW of m-audio m-tracker solo, it is feasible to obtain loudness and outstanding sound quality.

M-M-Track Audio’s Solo has a sample rate of 48 kHz, which appears to be a low sample rate. However, keep in mind that it is more than three times the price of any reasonable interface we would recommend. Consider how often you will need frequencies higher than 48 kHz.

Special Features

While the M-Track Solo stands out for its solid/secure inputs, powerful controls, and appealing design. The M-Track Solo, unlike the majority of interfaces at this price point, does not appear cheap even before you touch it.

On the other hand, one of the significant advantage of the Behringer U-Phoria UM2 is its outstanding built-in headphone amplifier. The amp is really powerful, and the music it creates is crystal clear and sharp. An audio interface at this pricing point would not normally include this feature.

M-Audio M-Track Solo vs Behringer UM2: Final Verdict

When it comes down to it, we only make decisions based on cost. We adore the M-Track Solo, which is a great contender on our list of the best budget interfaces but on the other we can not also ignore Behringer um2. We would not have ranked it so high if it had been $100 rather than under $50, and certainly not above the numerous fantastic interfaces listed below.

Most low-cost interfaces have weak headphone amps that produce only mediocre sound quality and volume, but the Behringer UM2 has a far more powerful headphone amp.

In a nutshell, there are many higher-quality interfaces available, but m-audio m–tracker solo is one of the finest in terms of cost-effectiveness!

MUST-READ| Sony SRS-XP700 Vs JBL Partybox 310: Which To Prefer?

Tarun Verma

Written by Tarun Verma

A serious technical content writer with a view to change the world with my philosophy and ideology and make this planet an even better place to live

Leave a Reply


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sony SRS-XG 500 VS Sony SRSXP-70

Sony SRS-XG 500 VS Sony SRSXP-70: Which One Is Better?

JBL 225 TWS Vs JBL Pro+

JBL 225 TWS Vs JBL Pro+: Which One To Choose?