The Nokia G60 5G had only been with us for a few days from quite a few days, and we were still attempting to learn how the device functions for an end user. The device was primarily connected to the local 4G network. Nevertheless, We used the device exclusively for a full week while traveling and dealing with various weather conditions, and We have got something to share about it in the review today.
If you’re searching for a device with an IP rating under Rs. 40,000, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G has been available in India for a little over some months and is still a capable premium smartphone. Samsung’s recently released Galaxy A53 5G is virtually the same phone as the one it replaced with a new ExynosSoC from Qualcomm. Due to the distinct performance differences between the two phones, as a result, we are eager to see whether the new model is a worthwhile upgrade.
Nokia G60 5G Vs Samsung A53: Comparison Table
|Features||Nokia G60 5G||Samsung A53|
|Model Name||Nokia G60 5G||Samsung A53|
|Series||Nokia G Series||Samsung A Seies|
|RAM||6 GB||6 GB|
|Storage||128 GB||128 GB|
|Online Pricing Range||₹29,999||₹30,499|
Nokia G60 5G Vs Samsung A53: Detailed Analysis
Design and Built Quality
The Nokia G60 5G is composed of recyclable materials and uses sustainable technology that has less of an impact on the environment. But that doesn’t imply that it’s poorly constructed or composed of inferior materials. The Nokia G60 5G actually has an excellent hand feel. You can perceive its durability from its compact body and appropriate weight and build. Even the material used for the camera area has been improved; it is no longer scratch-prone. This time around, the camera area has a matte surface and truly looks expensive.
The display is protected more effectively thanks to the use of Gorilla Glass 5 on the front of the device. The bundled clyster clear case provides additional protection, and it ought to be able to easily withstand an unexpected fall from the pocket. The Nokia G60 5G carries on the history of earlier Nokia devices in terms of durability. Additionally, with three years of updates promised, it should still be helpful in the future.
In terms of design, there isn’t much to distinguish the Galaxy A53 5G from the Galaxy A52 5G. Like the A52 and Galaxy A52S, it has Gorilla Glass 5 covering the screen and is built of plastic. Consequently, Samsung’s design team has been fairly lazy, right? Perhaps, but since the Galaxy A53 looks fantastic, We won’t hold that against them. Although the back is made of plastic, it has a great warm feel and a nice texture that provides lots of grips. Although the back is made of plastic, it has a wonderful warm feel. The white surface doesn’t reveal fingerprints or smudges unless you really look for them, and the swooping, integrated camera module is attractive and doesn’t appear much from the device.
However, Samsung has eliminated the 3.5mm headphone jack, which personally doesn’t bother me but might annoy others. The phone features a water-resistance grade of IP67, which is not typical of phones priced at this level. Because of its size and placement of the fingerprint sensor on the screen, the Galaxy A53 is difficult for us to use with one hand. The Galaxy A52’s fingerprint sensor was essentially its sole significant flaw, so improving it is a big deal.
It is a routine trend to reduce expenses by employing the use of a standard LCD display. Nokia G60 has a midrange display, to put it mildly. Despite there being no explicit mention of the display tuning other than the fact that it is covered by Gorilla Glass 5 and has a refresh rate of 120Hz, We were extremely pleased by how clear and brilliant the display is. You could be wrong, and we can’t say for sure, but it seems like the display functions similarly to the more contemporary Pro technology because the dynamic range and vibrancy vary according to the information it displays. In conclusion, the Nokia G60 5G display is one of the best HMD Global has made recently.
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s 6.5-inch full-HD+ Super AMOLED display is identical to that of the Galaxy A52s 5G. For scratch resistance, the flat display is built of Gorilla Glass 5. The top and bottom margins are notably thicker, in contrast to the left and right borders, which are rather thin. The display contains an inbuilt fingerprint reader. It is trustworthy and performs as promised. We appreciate how Samsung buried the earpiece slit, which is hardly noticeable, between the top frame and the display. The Galaxy A53 5G features an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, just like the Galaxy A52s 5G.
An excellent camera and Nokia were often associated. However, the two appear to be drifting apart after a few disappointing releases. However, the Nokia G60 5G is the first smartphone in a very long time to perform so much better than We had anticipated. We would genuinely advise anyone looking for a fantastic camera at a reasonable price to just give the Nokia G60 a try.
It’s easy to conclude that Night mode 2.0 is a nice update. Three new modes—the standard Night mode, Dark Vision, and Tripod mode—are introduced. In all respect, Nokia did warn and explain that the DarkVision just increased visibility in the dark. The DarkVision simply fails to manage brilliantly light subjects, whereas the normal Night mode produces crisper images and more aggressive control. However, because DarkVision lets in more light, colors are more accurate, but noise is also increased.
On the back of the Galaxy A53 5G, there are four cameras: a 64-megapixel primary camera with an f/1.8 aperture and optical image stabilization (OIS), a 12-megapixel wide-angle camera with a 123-degree field of view, and a pair of 5-megapixel macro and depth cameras. The 32MP selfie camera is positioned top-center on the screen, and the configuration is identical to that of the Galaxy A52. Samsung’s Single Take mode, Night mode, Pro mode, and video recording in FHD or 4K at 30 or 60 frames per second are among the features. Additionally, the camera has a number of Snapchat Filters, and the virtual reality effects are excellent.
Samsung’s highly saturated images won’t be to everyone’s taste, but there’s no doubt that the Galaxy A53 can really make some scenes pop off the screen. On a sunny day, the A53 will certainly highlight any green, blue, or red elements in a photograph. As an alternative, it provides you with the ideal social media picture without the need for editing. The A53 usually provides quality images. The wide-angle and primary cameras’ consistency is respectable, the selfie camera adequately captures skin tones and fine details in low light, and the low light performance is passable.
The SD695 platform is lightning quick, and when combined with 6 Gigabytes of Random Access Memory (RAM) and 128 Gigabytes of Storage, it makes even the most difficult tasks feel like child’s play. Smooth transitions, no lags, and, most importantly, no application crashes. In comparison to their most current offers using the SD480 platform, this is definitely a step forward. The Nokia G60 5G is a delight to use because the hardware and software are essentially in harmony.
Instead of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750 or Snapdragon 778 seen inside the A52 series phones, the Galaxy A53 includes a Samsung Exynos 1280 octa-core processor. It comes with 128GB or 256GB of storage capacity and 6GB or 8GB of RAM. Don’t automatically think you need the 256GB model of the Galaxy A53 because it is one of the few smartphones with a MicroSD card slot.
The performance of the phone isn’t always the fastest; the software occasionally exhibits observable pauses and sluggishness. You will notice them even though none of them is a deal-breaker or significantly affects the phone on a daily basis. For instance, starting the A53 requires a lot of time. The camera is a little slow to snap pictures, apps launch more slowly than they should, and some transitions and animations aren’t very fluid.
Despite using a 4500mAh cell, battery life isn’t that bad. The G60 5G comfortably lasts all day without the power source, even when compared to several similarly priced competitors with 5000mAh batteries and energy-efficient OLED panels, unless you’re really using the processor or spending most of your screen time filming movies. We are really happy because there was no power depletion, and the typical user’s usage pattern would easily last a day and a half. The 20w support enables faster charging when using a charger that is compatible and QC-certified. HMD Global essentially has a highly-optimized gadget in their hand that feels nice, functions well, and has a strong battery life, all of which are combined with an adaptive refresh rate display at 120Hz!
The A53 features a 5,000mAh battery, which, if you’re not a serious gamer, will last for two days. The battery has never dropped below 50% for us after a single day of moderate use, which includes social media, web surfing, texting, some video, and the camera. If any power-hungry games are added, the A53 begins to consume the battery’s juice. Unless you’re playing for hours, it will still last the entire day and into the next, but if you’re using the phone heavily, a run to the charger at the end of the first day will relieve all burden.
Nokia G60 5G Vs Samsung A53: Quick Results
|Particulars||Nokia G60 5G||Samsung A53||Which One Is Better?|
|Design and Built Quality||Good||Good||Any|
|Camera||Better||Good||Nokia G60 5G|
Final Verdict: Nokia G60 5G Vs Samsung A53
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a reasonably priced, dependable, attractive, and capable everyday smartphone, ideal for anyone who won’t be playing demanding games for hours on end every day and is mostly interested in the camera for sharing photographs online. The fingerprint sensor, which was the main drawback of the Galaxy A52, has been rectified for the A53, but the trouble it caused has been replaced by occasionally sluggish performance.
The G60 5G is wonderfully constructed, produces passable pictures, and performs admirably. But many of its competitors share the same flaws. The Motorola G82 doesn’t cost much extra, but it has an AMOLED screen, a larger battery, and the main camera with image stabilization. Even if it seems like it’s still very early for a strategy that hasn’t shown any real progress, we admire Nokia’s dedication to sustainability. Still, that might be sufficient to tip the scales in Nokia’s favor for people worried about the environmental impact of their products.