ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Vs OnePlus 10 Pro: Read The Comparison Here!

Table of Contents

A smartphone’s innovative features don’t make or break it, but they unquestionably elevate the ZTE Axon 40 to a more desirable position. This nearly-flagship handset from ZTE has a wow factor, which is difficult to find these days due to a hidden under-display camera and an in-display fingerprint reader. The OnePlus 10 Pro, on the other hand, represents a comeback for OnePlus. Let’s compare the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and the OnePlus 10 Pro to determine which performs better.

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Vs OnePlus 10 Pro: Comparison Table

Features	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra	OnePlus 10 Pro
Launching Year	2022	2022
Brand	ZTE	OnePlus
Model Name	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra	OnePlus 10 Pro
Series	ZTE Axon Series	OnePlus Series
OS	Android	Android
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage	128 GB	128 GB
Online Pricing Range	₹57,590	₹66,999
Customer Ratings	4/5	4/5

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Vs OnePlus 10 Pro: Detailed Review

Design And Display

When you pull the ZTE Axon 40 out of the box, the size of the device will be the first thing you notice. It significantly strains our large hands even without a case, and when we sit down, it frequently comes out of my pocket. Another distinguishing feature of the Axon 40 Ultra is hidden from notice. The selfie camera is located in the center, close to the top edge of the display, where most selfie cameras are.

All of that is, of course, in service of the 6.92-inch, 120Hz, edge-to-edge OLED display, which is extremely refreshing in that it is absolutely absent of chins, notches, or punch holes. You may also take advantage of an in-display fingerprint sensor, which surprised us by being very responsive and causing no obstacles to using the phone.

The 6.7-inch 10-bit 1440p curved AMOLED display from the OnePlus is equally remarkable. Although it could appear to be a carryover from the 9 Pro, there are a few significant enhancements. There is protection provided by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus. The optical in-display fingerprint reader has been raised a bit, making it more accessible than the 9 Pro’s approach. It is efficient and precise. Dolby Atmos-compatible dual speakers complete the multimedia package. The bass response could be a little bit better, but these get nice and loud with crisp mids.

Camera

The Primary camera of the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra generally takes top-notch pictures. It can record a lot of detail thanks to its 16MP resolution, and it is displayed very naturally without using excessive sharpening. There is hardly any noise at all. The ZTE photos may be a little too restrained for you if you’re used to a warmer and more vibrant look, but color reproduction is generally excellent. Since the under-display camera is hidden from view, the quality of your selfies will suffer. These are soft and hazy overall, with a variety of color hues, a small dynamic range, and other issues.

In today’s world, a phone’s camera can make or break it, especially if it wants to be a flagship model. OnePlus hasn’t always performed well in this area. Using Hasselblad once more, there are three rear cameras this time: a 48MP, 50MP, and an 8MP telephoto (3.3x optical zoom) with OIS. The 32MP front camera, located in the upper left corner of the display, can record 1080p video at 30 frames per second. It snapped decent selfies, but It could have been done without the numerous beauty settings that let you change everything from the size of your nose, chin, and eyes to the texture of your skin.

Performance and Battery

ZTE’s own version of Android, MyOS 12, is installed on top of Android 12 on the Axon 40 Ultra. It is less popular than Samsung’s OneUI or Xiaomi’s MIUI. The more we explored MyOS, the more we realized how open it was. The icons for the fast settings menu are big enough to display information clearly and make it simple to press and toggle them. ZTE increased the battery capacity for the Axon 40 Ultra to 5,000mAh. It also received a higher Endurance grade. However, the quick-charging capabilities of the Axon partially compensated for this shortcoming. The phone charges at a pretty quick 65W, although this is much slower than some rival flagships’ 80W or 120W charging speeds. From zero to full, you may charge in roughly 40 minutes.

In the same way that OxygenOS’s innumerable admirers and supporters are optimistic about its future. OnePlus planned to combine OxygenOS and ColorOS to create a single operating system, as those who have been following along would know. With the release of OxygenOS 13, OxygenOS will return to its previous appearance and feel, which is light, tidy, and similar to stock Android. The software experience on the OnePlus 10 Pro is significantly less bloated and features almost no spammy notifications.

Despite four attempts, the OnePlus 10 Pro’s 5000mAh battery failed to finish our normal Android Work battery life test. The phone’s internal battery software once stated that running down from a full charge to the point at which the handset powered down at 16% had lasted for 12 hours 43 minutes while We left the test running. This is a relatively ordinary performance for a modern high-end smartphone battery.

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Vs OnePlus 10 Pro: Quick Results

Particulars	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra	OnePlus 10 Pro	Which One Is Better?
Design & Display	Better	Good	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Performance And Battery	Good	Better	OnePlus 10 Pro
Camera	Good	Good	Any

Final Verdict: ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Vs OnePlus 10 Pro

This phone is elegant and has a nice feel in hand thanks to the tall frame and waterfall display from ZTE. When you want to watch a movie or play a game, there isn’t a notch or punch-hole eating up screen space because of the hidden camera. ZTE’s MyUI is excellent in terms of accessibility because it may be one of the easiest-to-use Android derivatives we’ve tried outside of stock Android.

The OnePlus 10 Pro significantly outperforms the OnePlus 9 Pro in practically every category. The style is fresh. The construction quality is excellent, and the weight distribution is ideal. The screen excels at providing a pleasurable multimedia experience and is more color accurate than previously. The haptics is sharper, and the speakers are louder. The software is tidy and properly optimized. Both the performance and battery life are good.